Matters Arising on JAMB 2025

By Comrade Sanusi A. S. Maikudi

When the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) Stakeholders Policy Meeting announced a cut-off mark of 150 out of 400 for university admission in 2025, many Nigerians were stunned. That score, just 37.5%, reignited a deep national conversation—one not just about numbers or performance, but about what kind of education system we truly want and what kind of future we are preparing for.

Was this a bold move toward inclusiveness or a quiet surrender to mediocrity? The truth, as always, lies somewhere in between, but it deserves a fuller, more honest exploration.

A Cut-Off and Its Consequences

At first glance, 150 may seem too low a bar for students seeking entry into institutions meant to produce tomorrow’s doctors, engineers, and policymakers. Critics are right to be concerned about declining standards. But defenders of the decision point to a different reality, a reality shaped by Nigeria’s exploding population, struggling education system, and ever-growing demand for higher learning.

With over 1.5 million UTME candidates each year, and a national population where more than 60% are under 25, the pressure on our universities is immense. Choosing a higher cut-off would shut out hundreds of thousands of young Nigerians, many of whom are already victims of inadequate basic education, poverty, and poor access to quality teachers and learning facilities.

We are, therefore, facing a dilemma. We want our universities to be centers of excellence. But we also want them to be accessible to the majority. The question is: how do we reconcile both goals?

The Global Trend: Massification Meets African Demographics

Around the world, higher education is undergoing a quiet revolution. This revolution is known as massification—the rapid expansion of access to universities and colleges. From China to India, and from Brazil to South Africa, countries are moving beyond elitist education systems to more inclusive ones.

In Africa, this trend is supercharged by demographics. Nigeria, in particular, is at the center of this storm. As the sixth most populous nation in the world, and projected to be third by 2050, Nigeria faces a monumental challenge: how to turn its youth bulge into a development dividend, not a destabilizing burden.

This demographic pressure means that even if the cut-off score was raised, the real problem, insufficient access and lack of preparation, would remain. What Nigeria needs now is not just a debate about numbers but a national strategy to expand opportunity while improving quality.

The Real Crisis Lies Beneath

The JAMB results are not the problem. They are a symptom. The deeper issue is a broken pipeline that starts from basic education and ends at the gates of the university.

Many students arriving at the university are underprepared. They struggle with reading comprehension, lack basic mathematical reasoning, and have never been taught how to study effectively. They come from overcrowded classrooms, underfunded schools, and environments where books are a luxury. These realities do not change because they score 200 or 300. So the real question is: what are our universities doing to catch them when they fall through the cracks?

Preparing Students to Learn, Not Just to Pass

If mass access is our path, then structured preparation and support must become our policy. Every student admitted into a Nigerian university whether with 150 or 300 deserves a fair chance to succeed. That means we must invest not just in admission processes, but in student induction and foundational learning skills.

Universities should institute formal orientation programs for all new students before lectures begin. These programs should not just be about campus rules or student conduct. They should help students understand what it means to learn at the university level how to manage their time, how to take effective notes, how to work independently, and how to seek help when needed.

In fact, a dedicated General Studies course on effective study techniques should be introduced in all universities. This should be more than a token requirement. It should be carefully designed to empower students especially those coming from disadvantaged backgrounds to navigate academic life with confidence and skill.

Supporting the Lecturers Who Must Teach Them

The story cannot end with the students. For too long, Nigerian universities have assumed that anyone with a Master’s or PhD is automatically fit to teach. But the world has moved on. In many parts of the globe, university lecturers undergo mandatory induction programs where they are taught how to teach not just what to teach. They learn about pedagogy, assessment, inclusive classrooms, and how to adapt their instruction to digital environments.

In Nigeria, we need to institutionalize Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for all academic staff. Lecturers should be constantly learning, upgrading their skills, and being evaluated not just on the number of journal articles they publish, but on how well they help students to learn and grow. Universities must reward excellent teaching, not just elite research.

A National Responsibility That Goes Beyond Government

We cannot build a successful university system by leaving it solely in the hands of government. Education is a shared responsibility. Parents and families must make their homes centers of learning, not just shelters for survival. Communities must monitor schools, protect teachers, and demand accountability. Religious institutions must promote values and support quality learning, especially in underserved areas. And the private sector must invest not just in scholarships, but in schools, infrastructure, and innovation.

Mass access to university is not a problem. Unprepared students and unsupported teachers are. And fixing that takes the combined will of every stakeholder in Nigerian society.

Charting a New Path: What We Must Do

First, we must rebuild the foundation starting from primary school. Teachers must be well-trained, well-paid, and well-supported. Learning outcomes should be assessed at every level, and states should be rewarded for improving basic literacy and numeracy.

Second, we must rethink university admissions. Not everyone will score 300 and that’s okay. Let us create remedial and foundation programs for those who need extra support. Let us diversify pathways into higher education through technical colleges, online learning, and skill certification.

Third, we must make faculty development a national policy. No university should employ a lecturer who has not undergone basic training in how to teach. CPD should be tied to promotion and institutional performance.

Fourth, we must support students throughout their journey, not just during admission. Academic support centers, tutoring, mentorship, and mental health services should be a regular part of every Nigerian university.

Finally, we must ensure our university system is aligned with national development. Curricula should reflect Nigeria’s real-world needs: agriculture, technology, governance, entrepreneurship, and innovation. Our universities should not just graduate people—they should solve problems.

Conclusion: Managing a Youthful Nation Requires Vision and Commitment

The 2025 JAMB cut-off score may feel controversial, but it is a mirror reflecting deeper truths. We are a young, growing country with a fragile education system. We are caught between wanting to be excellent and needing to be inclusive.

This is not a hopeless dilemma. It is a call to action. If we manage our massification smartly by investing in readiness, teacher quality, and systemic reform we can produce a generation not just of degree-holders, but of problem-solvers, nation-builders, and global citizens.

But to do that, we must first restore the primacy of education in our national priorities. Education is not just a pathway to employment it is the engine of nationhood. It is how we fight poverty, break cycles of ignorance, reduce inequality, and unlock the vast talents hidden across our towns and villages.

When a child learns, a family is empowered. When a teacher is trained, a community is uplifted. And when a university functions with integrity and innovation, a nation prepares itself for the future.

Education deserves not just rhetoric but resources. It deserves protection in times of conflict and priority in times of planning. It is not an expense it is an investment. An investment in peace. In productivity. In dignity. In progress.

Massification is here to stay. Mediocrity doesn’t have to be. If we act with courage, vision, and unity of purpose, we can build a university system and a country that leaves no one behind.

The ultimate duty is how best can we Reconcile  Access, Quality, and Demographics in Nigeria’s University System

Thank You

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *