FHC Abuja shifts trial of terrorism cases to Code of Conduct Tribunal

Advertisements
Screenshot_20240512_221028_Gallery
Screenshot_20240512_221158_Gallery
Screenshot_20240512_221137_Gallery

The Federal High Court (FHC), Abuja, has said that trial of terrorism cases will henceforth be holding at the premises of the Code of Conduct Tribunal.

The FHC, in a new practice directions on trial of terrorism cases made available by its Chief Information Officer of FHC, Dr Catherine Oby-Christopher, said the development was to ensure the safety and protect the identity of the victim or a witness in the matters.

“The Federal High Court of Nigeria wishes to notify the general public of its new Practice Directions on hearing of terrorism cases.

“The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court of Nigeria, Honourable Justice John Terhemba Tsoho, in exercise of his constitutional powers as enshrined in Section 254 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and all other powers enabling him, hereby makes the following Practice Directions. 

“These Practice Directions seek to provide measures that will ensure the security and safety of parties; personnel of law enforcement agencies and the Judiciary; as well as members of the general public; while ensuring expeditious and fair trial of persons suspected of having committed acts of terrorism,” it said. 

It said based on the new practice direction, the courtroom proceedings  shall be held in camera or as may be ordered by the court.

“Proceedings of offences of terrorism, subject to the provisions of Section 232 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 and Section 34 of the Terrorism (Prevention) Act, 2011 (as amended), shall be held in camera or as may be ordered by the Court.

“The names, addresses, telephone numbers and identity of the victims of such offences or witnesses in the proceedings shall not be disclosed in any record or report of the proceedings and it shall be sufficient to designate the names of the victims or witnesses with a combination of alphabets.

“In any proceedings where the court deems it necessary to ensure the safety and/or protect the identity of the victim or a witness, it may take any or all of the following protective measures:

“Hold its proceedings at any place to be designated by the Chief Judge and in the case of the Abuja Judicial Division, the venue for the time being, shall be the premises of the Code of Conduct Tribunal;

“Receive evidence by video link;
“Permit the witness to be screened or masked;
“Receive written depositions of expert witnesses;

“Direct that all or any part of the proceedings of the court shall not be published in any manner;

°Exclude from the proceedings any person other than the parties and their legal representatives;

°Make order as to any electronic devices that would be allowed during proceeding.

°Make order on any other measure that the Court considers appropriate in the circumstances,” it said. 

The FHC also said that “the coverage of proceedings under these practice directions is strictly prohibited, save as may be directed by the court.

“A person who contravenes an order or direction made under these Practice Directions shall be deemed to have committed an offence contrary to Section 34(5) of the Terrorism (Prevention) Act, 2011 (as amended).”

According to the court, these practice directions shall be cited as the Federal High Court Practice Directions (On Trial of Terrorism Cases) 2022.

It said based on Order 1 which relates to applicability of terrorism related suits that are before the FHC, the perimeters of the court sitting over a terrorism trial shall be secured for the period of the trial for safety of litigants and court officials.

“Distance and size of perimeters to be secured for the trial shall be determined based on the recommendation of security agencies on a case-by-case basis.

“No person shall be allowed within the secured perimeters save the approved court officials; parties and a number of pre- registered legal practitioners on either side, witnesses; and any other person as may be directed by the Judge or the most Senior Judge in the given circumstances.

“Other measures put in place to guarantee the safety of court officials and court users within the court premises include:

“Only the Judges; other essential court staff and security agencies involved in the particular case and their vehicles shall have access to the court premises,” it said. 

The FHC stressed that the direction would take immediate effect.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *